Skip to content

The Bottom Line

Best for
Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6.
Price
From $8/mo, billed monthly (free plan available). Compare plans

Key facts

  • Current models in the official picker include Claude Fable, Opus, Sonnet, GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Composer 2.5, and Grok 4.5 / 4.6.
  • Hobby is free. Individual starts at a paid tier (Pro). Pro+ is 3x Pro Agent limits. Ultra is 20x. Teams starts at a paid tier per user.
  • Tab, Agent, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. Extra model use can bill on-demand after the included pool.

Pros

  • Powerful AI features
  • VS Code based
  • Fast iterations

Cons

  • Subscription needed for full AI
  • Resource intensive

What is Cursor?

Cursor is an AI code editor built on VS Code. Official docs list current models including advanced models like Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GPT-5.6 Sol / Terra / Luna, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Composer 2.5, Grok 4.5, and Grok 4.6. Official pricing: Hobby is free; Individual starts at a paid tier; Teams starts at a paid tier per user; Enterprise is custom. Paid plans include extended Agent limits, frontier models, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. On-demand usage can bill in arrears after the included pool.

Available on: macOS, Web

Ratings Across the Web

3.3 (634 reviews)

Cursor holds an aggregate rating of 3.3 out of 5 from 634 reviews across G2 and Trustpilot, last checked September 17, 2026.

Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms. Learn more

Key Features

  • AI code editor
  • Tab completions
  • AI chat
  • Background Agents
  • Code review (Bugbot)
  • Multi-model support
  • Team collaboration
  • SAML/OIDC SSO
  • Usage analytics
  • Audit logs

Pricing Plans

Pricing checked Oct 30, 2026. Source: cursor.com/pricing, read Oct 30, 2026

Cursor plans and prices, checked October 2026
Plan Price Details
Free

$0

Free.

  • Limited AI usage
  • Limited agent requests
Plus

$8/month

Introductory plan.

  • Shared AI usage pool
  • Only Grok models
Premium Popular

$30/month

  • 4x more usage than Plus
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Third-party models at API list price
Super

$100/month

  • 15x more usage than Plus
  • Priority model access at peak times
Ultra

$200/month

  • 50x more usage than Plus
Teams

$30+/user/month

From $30 per user per month.

  • Pooled usage
  • 4x to 50x Plus
Enterprise

Custom

Is Cursor worth the price?

Good value

Best for solo developers and small teams who want AI-assisted coding without overpaying.

Hidden Costs & Gotchas

Teams requires per-user billing with no monthly minimum

Full Cursor pricing: every plan, hidden costs and alternatives

How Cursor's pricing compares

At $8/mo, billed monthly, Cursor is the most affordable of its 3 comparable direct competitors.

Not ranked, different unit or currency: Codeanywhere $9.60/member/mo, billed yearly.

Entry paid plan, monthly price, billed monthly. Pricing checked Oct 30, 2026.

Email me when Cursor changes its price

One email per change, found on the vendor's own pricing page. Unsubscribe any time.

Recent pricing updates

Changes we detected on the Cursor pricing page.

  • Plans changed: Free, Plus $8, Premium $30, Super $100, Ultra $200 a month, Teams from $30 per user a month; Hobby, Pro, Pro+ removed.

Cursor by the numbers

Toolradar data: Cursor's entry paid plan ($20/mo, billed monthly) ranks #22 of 35 (joint) for price among the IDE & Code Editors tools with a verified entry price and no stated unit, where the median is $12/mo. It is listed as an alternative to 136 other tools on Toolradar, ranking #1 of 130 in IDE & Code Editors. As of Oct 2026.

Cursor compared with 130 IDE & Code Editors tools on Toolradar, as of Oct 2026
Metric Cursor Peer median Position (1 is best)
Entry paid plan $20/mo, billed monthly $12/mo #22 of 35 (joint) tools with no stated price unit, verified price
Free plan Yes 90% have one n/a
Listed as an alternative to 136 tools 1 #1 of 130
User rating 3.3/5 (across the web, 634 ratings) 4.4/5 #44 of 44 tools with 20+ reviews
Compare-page visits, last 30 days 490 visits 53 #1 of 48 tools with 20+ compare-page visits

Visitors most often compare Cursor with Visual Studio Code, Claude Code and OpenAI Codex (last 30 days, Oct 2026).

Each position is counted among the tools that have data for that row, as noted under it. A lower entry price ranks higher; prices are read on vendor pages and compared only with tools priced on the same basis. All IDE & Code Editors data · How we compute this. Advertising and placement fees are not inputs to any position. Visit counts include visits from every source.

Cite this: Toolradar, “Cursor by the numbers”, Oct 2026.

Reviews

Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT cover
$99 Free with your review

Review Cursor, get a free AI guide

Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.

Write a review
3.3/5

Across 634 verified user reviews on Trustpilot, G2

Add your hands-on experience using the offer above to help the next buyer.

Best Cursor Alternatives

Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.

View full list →

Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.

Explore More

Cursor FAQ

How does Cursor help a developer refactor a large codebase?

Cursor provides AI-powered code editing built on VS Code, enabling developers to refactor large codebases using natural language commands. Its advanced models, including Claude Fable and GPT-5.6 Sol, can understand context across files and suggest or apply changes directly in the editor. This allows for fast iterations on complex refactoring tasks without leaving the IDE.

How does Cursor compare to Sourcegraph Cody?

Cursor is a full AI code editor built on VS Code, while Sourcegraph Cody is an AI coding assistant that integrates into existing editors. Cursor offers a broader set of built-in AI features like cloud agents and MCPs, and supports a wider range of frontier models including Claude Opus and Gemini 3.1 Pro. Cody focuses on codebase-wide context and search, whereas Cursor emphasizes in-editor AI-driven development and fast iterations.

What are the main limitations or trade-offs of using Cursor?

Cursor requires a subscription to access its full AI capabilities, including extended Agent limits and frontier models, which may be a barrier for casual users. Additionally, the editor is resource intensive, meaning it can consume significant system memory and processing power during heavy AI tasks. The free Hobby tier provides basic access but with limited usage.

Which teams benefit most from using Cursor?

Teams that build software rapidly and need AI-assisted code generation, refactoring, and debugging benefit most from Cursor. Engineering teams using VS Code as their primary editor can adopt Cursor with minimal workflow disruption, and its cloud agents and MCPs support collaborative development across larger groups. The Teams plan offers per-user pricing with shared features like skills and hooks.

How is Cursor priced?

Cursor offers a free Hobby tier with basic AI features, and paid Individual and Teams plans that include extended Agent limits, frontier models, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. On-demand usage beyond the included pool can be billed in arrears. Enterprise pricing is custom for larger organizations.

Can Cursor integrate with existing VS Code extensions and settings?

Yes, Cursor is built on VS Code, so it supports the same extensions, themes, and settings that developers already use in VS Code. This allows teams to migrate their existing development environment and workflows directly into Cursor without losing productivity. The editor also adds AI-specific features like Composer 2.5 and cloud agents on top of the familiar interface.

Does Cursor include a free tier for trying its AI features?

Yes, Cursor includes a free Hobby tier that provides access to basic AI features and limited usage of its models. This allows developers to evaluate the editor and its capabilities before committing to a paid plan. Paid plans unlock extended Agent limits, frontier models, and advanced features like cloud agents and MCPs.

Why would a developer choose Cursor over a standard VS Code setup?

A developer would choose Cursor over standard VS Code to gain integrated AI capabilities that accelerate coding tasks such as code generation, debugging, and refactoring. Cursor provides access to multiple frontier models like Claude Sonnet and GPT-5.6 Luna directly in the editor, along with features like cloud agents and MCPs that are not available in plain VS Code. This enables faster iterations and reduces context switching.

How does Cursor pricing compare with other IDE & Code Editors tools?

Cursor's entry paid plan ($20/mo, billed monthly) ranks #22 of 35 (joint) for price among the IDE & Code Editors tools with a verified entry price and no stated unit, where the median is $12/mo. Prices are read on each vendor's own pricing page and compared only with tools priced on the same basis. Source: Toolradar, Oct 2026.

Source: cursor.com

Guides & Articles